← New search

2012 Cadillac Srx

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most Srx years

Owner complaints for the 2012 Cadillac Srx are substantially higher than the model-year median of 192.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

270 reports with mileage · 146 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Exterior Lighting. Review the 233 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Service Brakes. Review the 42 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Suspension. Review the 41 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

32 crash reports4 fire reports23 injury reports

Exterior Lighting complaints

233 reports
Clear category filter
38,000 miles · Oct 17, 2018
Exterior Lighting

LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS ARE TOO DIM TO DRIVE AT NIGHT. THE DEALER SAYS THERE IS NO COMPLETE FIX THAT'S JUST THE WAY IT IS. TRIED BRIGHTER BULBS NO HELP, THE DESIGN OF THE HEAD LIGHT ASSEMBLY IS FLAWED AND IF YOU REPLACE THEM IT'S ONLY A TEMPORARY FIX. THE ONLY WAY TO SEE AT NIGHT IS WITH HI BEAMS ON.

NHTSA ODI #11140990

135,000 miles · Oct 13, 2018
Exterior Lighting

WHILE DRIVING OR IN PARK AT NIGHT, UNABLE TO SEE SAFELY WITH LOW BEAMS ON--MUST DRIVE WITH HIGH BEAMS ON. THERE IS EXCESSIVE MOISTURE INSIDE OF HEADLIGHT WHICH IS SUPPOSEDLY SEALED. PAID $700 TO HAVE ONE HEADLIGHT ASSEMBLY REPLACED WITH ORIGINAL (NOT AFTERMARKET) TWO YEARS AGO AND THE SEAL IS CLEARLY BROKE. HAVE ALSO TRIED REPLA…

Read full complaint

WHILE DRIVING OR IN PARK AT NIGHT, UNABLE TO SEE SAFELY WITH LOW BEAMS ON--MUST DRIVE WITH HIGH BEAMS ON. THERE IS EXCESSIVE MOISTURE INSIDE OF HEADLIGHT WHICH IS SUPPOSEDLY SEALED. PAID $700 TO HAVE ONE HEADLIGHT ASSEMBLY REPLACED WITH ORIGINAL (NOT AFTERMARKET) TWO YEARS AGO AND THE SEAL IS CLEARLY BROKE. HAVE ALSO TRIED REPLACING BULBS. AFTER READING OF THE CLASS ACTION LAWSUITS IN CALIFORNIA AND FLORIDA, I CONTACTED CADILLAC TO SEE IF THEY WOULD REPLACE MY HEAD LIVES. BECAUSE I AM OUT OF WARRANTY, THEY WERE ON WILLING TO WORK WITH ME, EVEN THOUGH THIS IS CLEARLY A SAFETY ISSUE. WHILE DRIVING WITH LOW BEAMS ON, ONE CANNOT EVEN SEE THE CENTER OR SIDE LINES OF THE ROAD YOU ARE DRIVING.

NHTSA ODI #11140191

120,000 miles · Oct 9, 2018
Exterior Lighting

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 CADILLAC SRX. WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS STATIONARY AND WHILE DRIVING VARIOUS SPEEDS AT NIGHT, THE HEADLIGHTS MALFUNCTIONED. SUTTLE CADILLAC (12525 JEFFERSON AVENUE, NEWPORT NEWS, VIRGINIA 23602) WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE AND REPLACED THE LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS TWICE, BUT THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE MANUFAC…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 CADILLAC SRX. WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS STATIONARY AND WHILE DRIVING VARIOUS SPEEDS AT NIGHT, THE HEADLIGHTS MALFUNCTIONED. SUTTLE CADILLAC (12525 JEFFERSON AVENUE, NEWPORT NEWS, VIRGINIA 23602) WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE AND REPLACED THE LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS TWICE, BUT THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 120,000.

NHTSA ODI #11139316

63,000 miles · Oct 9, 2018
Exterior LightingVisibility/wiper

LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS DO NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE LIGHTING AT NIGHT. YOU CANNOT SEE 30 FEET IN FRONT OF THE CAR ON A DARK ROAD. I HAVE BEEN TOLD BY MECHANICS THAT THERE IS NOTHING THEY CAN DO TO GUARANTEE IMPROVEMENT. THIS IS BOTH GM MECHANICS AND INDEPENDENT. NOT BEING ABLE TO SEE WHEN YOU ARE DRIVING AT NIGHT IS NOT ONLY DANGEROUS …

Read full complaint

LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS DO NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE LIGHTING AT NIGHT. YOU CANNOT SEE 30 FEET IN FRONT OF THE CAR ON A DARK ROAD. I HAVE BEEN TOLD BY MECHANICS THAT THERE IS NOTHING THEY CAN DO TO GUARANTEE IMPROVEMENT. THIS IS BOTH GM MECHANICS AND INDEPENDENT. NOT BEING ABLE TO SEE WHEN YOU ARE DRIVING AT NIGHT IS NOT ONLY DANGEROUS TO ME BUT ALSO TO ONCOMING DRIVERS AS I HAVE TO USE MY BRIGHT LIGHTS TO SEE WHERE I AM GOING AND CONSEQUENTLY CREATE GLARE FOR THE ONCOMING CARS. I FEEL THAT CADILLAC HAS A RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE SAFETY WHEN THEY SELL A PRODUCT. PLEASE RECALL THE CAR AND RESOLVE THIS PROBLEM. I AM PLANNING TO KEEP THIS CAR FOR MORE THAN FOUR MORE YEARS AND DONT WANT TO HAVE A SAFETY PROBLEM TO TRY TO WORK AROUND. I HAVE OWNED THE CAR FROM NEW IN 2012 AND USE IT EVERYDAY. IT HAS BEEN, AND IS, MAINTAINED BY GM. DEALERS .

NHTSA ODI #11139290

10,000 miles · Oct 5, 2018
Exterior Lighting

I PURCHASED MY VEHICLE BRAND NEW IN 2012. WITHIN A SHORT WHILE, I NOTICED HOW DIM THE HEADLIGHTS WERE. IT IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS/IMPOSSIBLE TO DRIVE MY VEHICLE AT NIGHT AS THESE HEADLIGHTS CAUSE LITTLE TO NO VISIBILITY. WHEN I CALLED THE DEALERSHIP THEY SAID IF THEY WERE TO REPLACE THE CURRENT HEADLIGHTS THEY WOULD REPLACED WI…

Read full complaint

I PURCHASED MY VEHICLE BRAND NEW IN 2012. WITHIN A SHORT WHILE, I NOTICED HOW DIM THE HEADLIGHTS WERE. IT IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS/IMPOSSIBLE TO DRIVE MY VEHICLE AT NIGHT AS THESE HEADLIGHTS CAUSE LITTLE TO NO VISIBILITY. WHEN I CALLED THE DEALERSHIP THEY SAID IF THEY WERE TO REPLACE THE CURRENT HEADLIGHTS THEY WOULD REPLACED WITH THE SAME FAULTY HEADLIGHTS UNFORTUNATELY. I WAS THEN TOLD BY THE DEALERSHIP THAT MY ONLY OPTION IS TO SELL THE CAR. I CANNOT AFFORD A NEW CAR AND KNOW THAT THE PROPER & FAIR SOLUTION WOULD BE FOR CADILLAC TO ISSUE A RECALL ON THESE HEADLIGHTS AND REPLACE THEM WITH PROPER, SAFE AND FUNCTIONING HEADLIGHTS. THANK YOU.

NHTSA ODI #11133525

105,000 miles · Oct 1, 2018
Exterior Lighting

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 CADILLAC SRX. WHILE DRIVING VARIOUS SPEEDS, THE HEADLAMPS WERE DIM AND CREATED POOR VISIBILITY WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO BARKLEY BUICK GMC (3575 SKYLAND BLVD E, TUSCALOOSA, AL 35405) AND THE LIGHT BULBS WERE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED; HOWEVER, THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE …

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 CADILLAC SRX. WHILE DRIVING VARIOUS SPEEDS, THE HEADLAMPS WERE DIM AND CREATED POOR VISIBILITY WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO BARKLEY BUICK GMC (3575 SKYLAND BLVD E, TUSCALOOSA, AL 35405) AND THE LIGHT BULBS WERE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED; HOWEVER, THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN BACK TO THE DEALER, BUT THE CAUSE OF THE FAILURE WAS UNDETERMINED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 105,000. THE VIN WAS NOT PROVIDED.

NHTSA ODI #11132453

Mileage unknown · Sep 17, 2018
Exterior Lighting

OUR HEADLIGHTS HAVE GOTTEN DIMMER AND DIMMER (NOW TO DANGEROUS TO DRIVE AT NIGHT AND BAD WEATHER). WHEN PARKED WITH HEADLIGHTS SHINING ON A WALL YOU CAN SEE SOME LIGHT, BUT ON THE ROAD THE LIGHT PRODUCED FEELS VERY UNSAFE. THE ONLY WAY TO USE THE CAR IS WITH THE HIGH-BEAMS TO GET ENOUGH LIGHT TO DRIVE SAFELY, BUT THIS IS RUDE (…

Read full complaint

OUR HEADLIGHTS HAVE GOTTEN DIMMER AND DIMMER (NOW TO DANGEROUS TO DRIVE AT NIGHT AND BAD WEATHER). WHEN PARKED WITH HEADLIGHTS SHINING ON A WALL YOU CAN SEE SOME LIGHT, BUT ON THE ROAD THE LIGHT PRODUCED FEELS VERY UNSAFE. THE ONLY WAY TO USE THE CAR IS WITH THE HIGH-BEAMS TO GET ENOUGH LIGHT TO DRIVE SAFELY, BUT THIS IS RUDE (AND UNSAFE) FOR OTHER DRIVERS. WE AVOID USING THE CAR AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE BECAUSE OF THIS ISSUE. AFTER LOOKING UP THE PROBLEM ON THE INTERNET, IT APPEARS THIS IS A COMMON PROBLEM THAT CADILLAC HAS NOT ADDRESS. LOOKS LIKE SOMEONE HAS EVEN FILED A CLASS ACTION SUIT IN CALIFORNIA TO TRY AND GET THIS PROBLEM ADDRESSED.

NHTSA ODI #11129889

Mileage unknown · Aug 20, 2018
Electrical SystemExterior Lighting

THE EXTERIOR HEADLIGHTS ON LOW BEAM YOU CANNOT SEE THE ROAD WITH THESE LIGHTS. MY WIFE HAS ALMOST RAN INTO A DITCH BECAUSE THESE HEADLIGHTS ARE DEFECTIVE. IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING GENERAL MOTORS DOES NOT WANT TO TAKE FAULT WITH THIS PROBLEM. IS SOMEONE GOING TO HAVE TO BE KILLED BEFORE ANYTHING IS DONE. WHERE DO WE GO OR WHAT DO WE…

Read full complaint

THE EXTERIOR HEADLIGHTS ON LOW BEAM YOU CANNOT SEE THE ROAD WITH THESE LIGHTS. MY WIFE HAS ALMOST RAN INTO A DITCH BECAUSE THESE HEADLIGHTS ARE DEFECTIVE. IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING GENERAL MOTORS DOES NOT WANT TO TAKE FAULT WITH THIS PROBLEM. IS SOMEONE GOING TO HAVE TO BE KILLED BEFORE ANYTHING IS DONE. WHERE DO WE GO OR WHAT DO WE DO TO GET THIS PROBLEM TAKEN CARE OF BY GENERAL MOTORS. ANYTIME YOU DRIVE THIS CAR AT NIGHT YOU ARE PUTTING YOUR LIFE ENDANGER

NHTSA ODI #11121175

103,000 miles · Aug 14, 2018
Electrical SystemElectronic Stability Control (esc)Exterior Lighting

HEADLIGHTS START RANDOMLY DIMMING TO THE POINT YOU CAN'T SEE TO DRIVE, DASH STABILITY CONTROL & TRACTION CONTROL LIGHTS KEEP GOING ON AND OFF. ENGINE FANS TURNS ON AND WON'T TURN OFF EVEN AFTER VEHICLE HAS BEEN SHUT OFF.

NHTSA ODI #11119808

101,000 miles · Jul 22, 2018
Exterior Lighting

MY LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS ARE VERY DIM. HAVE BEEN EXPERIENCING THIS ISSUE FOR THE PAST SEVERAL MONTHS. LAST WEEK ALMOST HAD AN ACCIDENT BECAUSE OF POOR VISIBILITY. A CAR PULLED OUT IN FRONT OF ME WHILE ON THE HIGHWAY BECAUSE THEY COULDN'T SEE MY HEADLIGHTS. I HAD NO IDEA THE PROBLEM WAS THAT BAD. IT APPEARS, BASED ON RESEARCH, THAT…

Read full complaint

MY LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS ARE VERY DIM. HAVE BEEN EXPERIENCING THIS ISSUE FOR THE PAST SEVERAL MONTHS. LAST WEEK ALMOST HAD AN ACCIDENT BECAUSE OF POOR VISIBILITY. A CAR PULLED OUT IN FRONT OF ME WHILE ON THE HIGHWAY BECAUSE THEY COULDN'T SEE MY HEADLIGHTS. I HAD NO IDEA THE PROBLEM WAS THAT BAD. IT APPEARS, BASED ON RESEARCH, THAT THIS IS A COMMON, WIDESPREAD PROBLEM WITH THIS MODEL. GM IS WELL AWARE OF PROBLEM AND OFFERS NO SOLUTION FOR THE REPAIR AS THE SAME DEFECTIVE PARTS ARE INSTALLED AT A HIGH COST, BUT PROBLEM REMAINS. THERE ARE AT LEAST TWO CLASS-ACTION LAWSUITS WHICH HAVE BEEN FILED. PLEASE TAKE THIS TO THE NEXT LEVEL WITH GM, HAVE THEM TAKE CARE OF THIS DEFECT AND PROTECT CONSUMERS.

NHTSA ODI #11112932

Official recalls

3

21V473000 · Suspension:rear

Jun 24, 2021

General Motors, LLC (GM) is recalling certain 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles. The rear suspension toe link adjuster may not have been tightened properly, which could result in a loose toe link.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A loose toe link can separate and cause a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Owners are advised to not drive their vehicle if they experience certain Malfunction Indicator Lamp (MIL) warnings or other issues, such as unusual steering behavior, while driving. Please see the Part 573 report for the full list of warnings. Dealers will replace the adjustable toe link with a non-adjustable one, free of charge. Interim owner notification letters were mailed August 6, 2021. Owner notification letters were mailed on October 25, 2021. Cadillac and Saab customers may direct questions to Cadillac customer service at 1-800-333-4223. GM's number for this recall is N212340980.

14V571000 · Suspension:rear

Sep 19, 2014

General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles manufactured April 14, 2009, to September 1, 2014, and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles manufactured February 1, 2011, to September 13, 2011. On the affected vehicles, the jam nut in the rear suspension toe adjuster link may not be torqued to the proper specification. A loose toe adjuster link can cause the vehicle to sway or wander at highway speeds. A loose toe adjuster link may lead to thread damage and eventual failure. Failure of the toe adjuster link will cause an abrupt change in the vehicle's alignment.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: Failure of the toe adjuster link could cause a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: GM will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the torque of the left and right rear toe link adjuster lock nuts, and replace the parts if there is evidence of damage or a loose link, free of charge. The The recall began November 11, 2014. Owners may contact Cadillac customer service at 1-800-458-8006 or Saab customer service at 1-800-955-9007. GM's number for this recall is 14457.

14V447000 · Seats:front Assembly:power Adjust

Jul 23, 2014

General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2011-2012 Buick LaCrosse, Regal and Chevrolet Camaro, as well as certain 2010-2012 Cadillac SRX, Chevrolet Equinox and GMC Terrain vehicles, equipped with power height adjustable driver and passenger seats. In the affected vehicles, the bolt that secures the driver's and passenger's power front seat height adjuster may fall out causing the seat to drop suddenly to the lowest vertical position.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If the driver's seat unexpectedly drops, the distraction and altered seat position may affect the drivers' control of the vehicle, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: GM will notify owners, and dealers will replace the height adjuster shoulder bolts, free of charge. The manufacturer distributed interim letters to owners on September 11, 2014. The recall began on December 26, 2014. Owners may contact GM customer service at 1-800-521-7300 (Buick), 1-800-458-8006 (Cadillac), 1-800-222-1020 (Chevrolet), or 1-800-462-8782 (GMC). GM's number for this recall is 14271.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

PE20019 · Rear Toe Link Adjuster Separation

Opened Nov 6, 2020 · Closed Dec 23, 2021

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Suspension; Suspension:rear

On November 06, 2020, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE20-019) to assess the remedy and scope of General Motors (GM) recall 14V-571. ODI had received a total of 9 complaints with allegations of rear toe links separating while the vehicle was in motion. There were 4 complainants indicating that the remedy for recall 14V-571 had been performed on their vehicle. The other 5 complaints were outside the original recall scope but exhibited the same failure mode as addressed by recall 14V-571 and reported uncontrolled swaying while driving.ODI's review focused on all 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles that experienced a rear toe link failure while the vehicle was in motion under various driving conditions. The failures were the same or similar to those addressed by the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. The remedy for recall 14V-571 was to inspect the rear toe link adjusters and replace them if necessary as well as tighten both jam nuts to a manufacturer specified torque. The remedy can be reversed when the vehicle gets a rear alignment adjustment and the jam nuts are not properly re-torqued to the manufacturer's specification. ODI's data review confirmed a high toe link failure rate in vehicles that either had and had not received the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. On June 24, 2021, GM filed a defect information report recalling all 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles to remedy the potential failure of the rear toe link adjuster while driving. The remedy replaces adjustable toe links with non-adjustable toe links. The recall (21V-473) includes vehicles that were remedied under 14V-571. In view of the recall action being taken by GM, ODI is closing this Preliminary Evaluation. NHTSA reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by future circumstances.The ODI complaints cited above can be viewed at www.nhtsa.gov.The ODI identification numbers for the complaints cited above can be found in a separate document attached to this closing resume.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Suspension

On November 06, 2020, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE20-019) to assess the remedy and scope of General Motors (GM) recall 14V-571. ODI had received a total of 9 complaints with allegations of rear toe links separating while the vehicle was in motion. There were 4 complainants indicating that the remedy for recall 14V-571 had been performed on their vehicle. The other 5 complaints were outside the original recall scope but exhibited the same failure mode as addressed by recall 14V-571 and reported uncontrolled swaying while driving.ODI's review focused on all 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles that experienced a rear toe link failure while the vehicle was in motion under various driving conditions. The failures were the same or similar to those addressed by the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. The remedy for recall 14V-571 was to inspect the rear toe link adjusters and replace them if necessary as well as tighten both jam nuts to a manufacturer specified torque. The remedy can be reversed when the vehicle gets a rear alignment adjustment and the jam nuts are not properly re-torqued to the manufacturer's specification. ODI's data review confirmed a high toe link failure rate in vehicles that either had and had not received the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. On June 24, 2021, GM filed a defect information report recalling all 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles to remedy the potential failure of the rear toe link adjuster while driving. The remedy replaces adjustable toe links with non-adjustable toe links. The recall (21V-473) includes vehicles that were remedied under 14V-571. In view of the recall action being taken by GM, ODI is closing this Preliminary Evaluation. NHTSA reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by future circumstances.The ODI complaints cited above can be viewed at www.nhtsa.gov.The ODI identification numbers for the complaints cited above can be found in a separate document attached to this closing resume.

Suspension:rear

On November 06, 2020, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE20-019) to assess the remedy and scope of General Motors (GM) recall 14V-571. ODI had received a total of 9 complaints with allegations of rear toe links separating while the vehicle was in motion. There were 4 complainants indicating that the remedy for recall 14V-571 had been performed on their vehicle. The other 5 complaints were outside the original recall scope but exhibited the same failure mode as addressed by recall 14V-571 and reported uncontrolled swaying while driving.ODI's review focused on all 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles that experienced a rear toe link failure while the vehicle was in motion under various driving conditions. The failures were the same or similar to those addressed by the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. The remedy for recall 14V-571 was to inspect the rear toe link adjusters and replace them if necessary as well as tighten both jam nuts to a manufacturer specified torque. The remedy can be reversed when the vehicle gets a rear alignment adjustment and the jam nuts are not properly re-torqued to the manufacturer's specification. ODI's data review confirmed a high toe link failure rate in vehicles that either had and had not received the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. On June 24, 2021, GM filed a defect information report recalling all 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles to remedy the potential failure of the rear toe link adjuster while driving. The remedy replaces adjustable toe links with non-adjustable toe links. The recall (21V-473) includes vehicles that were remedied under 14V-571. In view of the recall action being taken by GM, ODI is closing this Preliminary Evaluation. NHTSA reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by future circumstances.The ODI complaints cited above can be viewed at www.nhtsa.gov.The ODI identification numbers for the complaints cited above can be found in a separate document attached to this closing resume.