← New search

2012 Cadillac Srx

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most Srx years

Owner complaints for the 2012 Cadillac Srx are substantially higher than the model-year median of 192.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

270 reports with mileage · 146 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Exterior Lighting. Review the 233 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Service Brakes. Review the 42 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Suspension. Review the 41 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

32 crash reports4 fire reports23 injury reports

Exterior Lighting complaints

233 reports
Clear category filter
96,432 miles · Jan 24, 2020
Exterior Lighting

WE WERE DRIVING BACK FROM DINNER IT WAS DARK AND RAINING ALL OF A SUDDEN THE DRIVER SIDE LOW BEAM HEADLIGHT STOPPED WORKING I COULD NOT SEE THE CENTERLINE AND ALMOST HAD A HEAD-ON COLLISION THEN THERE WAS A POLICE CAR IN BACK OF ME AND PULLED US OVER FOR NO HEADLIGHT SAYING THAT HE KNEW OFF OTHER PEOPLE WITH THE SAME HAPPENING…

Read full complaint

WE WERE DRIVING BACK FROM DINNER IT WAS DARK AND RAINING ALL OF A SUDDEN THE DRIVER SIDE LOW BEAM HEADLIGHT STOPPED WORKING I COULD NOT SEE THE CENTERLINE AND ALMOST HAD A HEAD-ON COLLISION THEN THERE WAS A POLICE CAR IN BACK OF ME AND PULLED US OVER FOR NO HEADLIGHT SAYING THAT HE KNEW OFF OTHER PEOPLE WITH THE SAME HAPPENING ISSUED A WARRING AND WE PROCEEDED UP THE ROAR WITH CAUTION

NHTSA ODI #11301702

76,000 miles · Jan 24, 2020
Exterior Lighting

LOW BEAM HEADLAMPS HAVE DIMMED TO THE POINT OF HAVING TO USE THE HIGH BEAMS ALL THE TIME. UNDERSTAND THERE HAS BEEN A PROBLEM WITH THIS YEAR'S HEADLAMP ASSEMBLY WITH WATER ENTERING INSIDE AND DIMMING THE LAMPS. HAVE CONTACTED GM/CADILLAC AS THERE WAS A SERVICE BULLETIN ISSUED. WE WERE NEVER INFORMED OF PRIOR LITIGATION AND FE…

Read full complaint

LOW BEAM HEADLAMPS HAVE DIMMED TO THE POINT OF HAVING TO USE THE HIGH BEAMS ALL THE TIME. UNDERSTAND THERE HAS BEEN A PROBLEM WITH THIS YEAR'S HEADLAMP ASSEMBLY WITH WATER ENTERING INSIDE AND DIMMING THE LAMPS. HAVE CONTACTED GM/CADILLAC AS THERE WAS A SERVICE BULLETIN ISSUED. WE WERE NEVER INFORMED OF PRIOR LITIGATION AND FEEL THAT THIS IS A SAFETY PROBLEM AND SHOULD BE ADDRESSED BY GM/CADILLAC. THANK YOU

NHTSA ODI #11301641

100,000 miles · Jan 13, 2020
Exterior Lighting

THE LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS ON THIS CADILLAC SRX VEHICLE HAVE BECOME PROGRESSIVELY DIM TO THE POINT IT IS A SAFETY HAZARD TO DRIVE AT NIGHT. THE HEADLIGHT BULBS HAVE BEEN REPLACED BUT THIS HAS NOT ALLEVIATED THE DEFICIENCY, WHICH RESEARCH HAS DISCLOSED IS A RESULT OF FAULTY HEADLIGHT DESIGN AND MANUFACTURE. GM/CADILLAC IS AWARE OF T…

Read full complaint

THE LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS ON THIS CADILLAC SRX VEHICLE HAVE BECOME PROGRESSIVELY DIM TO THE POINT IT IS A SAFETY HAZARD TO DRIVE AT NIGHT. THE HEADLIGHT BULBS HAVE BEEN REPLACED BUT THIS HAS NOT ALLEVIATED THE DEFICIENCY, WHICH RESEARCH HAS DISCLOSED IS A RESULT OF FAULTY HEADLIGHT DESIGN AND MANUFACTURE. GM/CADILLAC IS AWARE OF THE PROBLEM, AND HAS EVEN PAID FOR HEADLIGHT REPLACEMENT AS A RESULT OF CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT SETTLEMENTS, BUT THESE SETTLEMENTS HAVE BEEN STATE-BY-STATE AND HAVE NOT HELPED A MAJORITY OF OWNERS, INCLUDUNG ME. FLORIDA PURCHASERS RECEIVED HEADLIGHT REPLACEMENT ASSISTANCE. I LIVE IN FLORIDA BUT PURCHASED THE VEHICLE IN CONNECTICUT AND THEREFORE RECEIVED NO ASSISTANCE, EVEN THOUGH MY VEHICLE IS JUST AS UNSAFE DRIVING IN FLORIDA AS THE ONES GM/CADILLAC PAID TO FIX. THE NIGHT LOW BEAM HEADLIGHT OUTPUT IS ABYSMALLY LOW, TO THE POINT THAT THE HEADLIGHTS FROM FOLLOWING CARS PROVIDE MORE ILLUMINATION THAN MY VEHICLE'S OWN HEADLIGHTS. USING HIGH BEAMS IS BENEFICIAL WHEN THERE IS NO ONCOMING TRAFFIC; HOWEVER, THERE IS VERY OFTEN ONCOMING TRAFFIC. BECAUSE GM/CADILLAC IS VERY AWARE OF THIS PROBLEM AND IS UNWILLING TO ADDRESS IT, AND BECAUSE DRIVING AT NIGHT WITH INSUFFICIENT HEADLIGHT ILLUMINATION IS CLEARLY A SAFETY HAZARD, I BELIEVE THIS IS EXACTLY THE SITUATION IN WHICH THE NHTSA SHOULD FORCE REMEDIAL ACTION.

NHTSA ODI #11299052

Mileage unknown · Jan 10, 2020
Electrical SystemElectronic Stability Control (esc)Exterior Lighting

IM THINKING OF REACHING OUT TO AN ATTORNEY BEFORE SOMEONE IS KILLED IN THIS CAR OR BY THIS CAR. PURCHASED NEW 2012 SRX. HAS 49,000 MILES.SUNROOF BROKE 2 DIFFERENT TIME $3500. LIFTGATE/SUNROOF WOULDN'T OPEN $3500. MY HUSBAND RESEARCHED TO FIND THIS MODEL HAS FAULTY DRAIN HOSE IN SUNROOF CAUSING WATER TO LEAK INTO VEHICLE RESULTI…

Read full complaint

IM THINKING OF REACHING OUT TO AN ATTORNEY BEFORE SOMEONE IS KILLED IN THIS CAR OR BY THIS CAR. PURCHASED NEW 2012 SRX. HAS 49,000 MILES.SUNROOF BROKE 2 DIFFERENT TIME $3500. LIFTGATE/SUNROOF WOULDN'T OPEN $3500. MY HUSBAND RESEARCHED TO FIND THIS MODEL HAS FAULTY DRAIN HOSE IN SUNROOF CAUSING WATER TO LEAK INTO VEHICLE RESULTING IN EROSION IN THE ELECTRICAL MODULE CAUSING SHORT OUT YET CADILLAC, OR GM WILL ADMIT. NUMEROUS COMPLAINTS ONLINE. GOOGLE 2012 CADILLAC SRX IT'S DISHEARTENING KNOWING THE PRICE YOU PAID TO GET SCREWED! WHAT NEXT? I HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE TO SEE AT NIGHT LIGHTS ON DIM MAY AS WELL BE OFF! NUMEROUS TIMES ALMOST WRECKED TRYING TO SEE. PURCHASED EXTENDED WARRANTY. CALLED JOHNSON MOTOR CO 12/26/19, COULDN'T GET ME IN UNTIL 1/6/20. DROPPED CAR OFF 8AM MONDAY SERVICE TECH AGREED THERE WAS MOISTURE AND FADING OF MY LIGHTS THIS IS A MAJOR PROBLEM WITH THIS MAKE BUT MOST LIKELY I WILL BE RESPONSIBLE. STATED FLA AND CAL WERE THE ONLY STATES A LAWSUIT WAS SETTLED. HOW CAN GM/CADILLAC SETTLE IN 2 STATES AND NOT EVERYONE WHO OWNS THESE DEFECTIVE VEHICLES WITH THE SAME ISSUES? REMEMBER MON MORNING DROPPED MY CAR OFF I RECEIVE A CALL 930 STATING BAD NEWS WE DON'T COVER THIS AND YOUR EXTENDED WARRANTY RAN OUT AT MIDNIGHT LAST NIGHT(SUNDAY) YOU CAN CALL CADILLAC AND COMPLAIN MOST LIKELY THEY WONT TAKE RESPONSIBILITY. ARE YOU KIDDING ME RIGHT NOW? TRIED TO GET MY CAR IN WEEK AND HALF PRIOR AND THIS IS FAULTY DESIGNS THAT HAS TO DO WITH GM/CAD NOT ANYTHING I'VE DONE OR CAUSED FROM AGE.YOU PUSHED ME OUT 2 WEEKS FOR SERVICE. I REACHED OUT TO NUMEROUS INDIVIDUALS TRYING TO FIGHT THIS EXPENSIVE ISSUE ONLY TO BE TOLD OVER AND OVER "IM SORRY I UNDERSTAND" NOT TO MENTION THEY KEPT MY CAR FOR A WEEK, DID NOTHING TO IT, WOULD NOT PUT ME IN A LOANER CAR. WHAT KIND OF CUSTOMR SERVICE IS THIS? I WILL NEVER BUY ANOTHER CADILLAC! I HOPE THIS HELPS SOMEONE NOT TO WASTE THEIR $$$$$$

NHTSA ODI #11298396

80,000 miles · Jan 7, 2020
Exterior Lighting

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 CADILLAC SRX. WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT, THE LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS WERE VERY DIM. THE CONTACT WAS UNABLE TO SEE THE ROAD AND HAD TO USED THE HIGH BEAM HEADLIGHTS. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO MASSEY CADILLAC ORLANDO NORTH (4241 N JOHN YOUNG PKWY, ORLANDO, FL 32804, (855) 934-7395) WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT T…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 CADILLAC SRX. WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT, THE LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS WERE VERY DIM. THE CONTACT WAS UNABLE TO SEE THE ROAD AND HAD TO USED THE HIGH BEAM HEADLIGHTS. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO MASSEY CADILLAC ORLANDO NORTH (4241 N JOHN YOUNG PKWY, ORLANDO, FL 32804, (855) 934-7395) WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE ENTIRE HEADLIGHT COMPONENTS ON BOTH SIDES NEEDED TO BE REMOVED TO BE ABLE TO REPLACE THE HEADLIGHTS. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 80,000.

NHTSA ODI #11297603

95,700 miles · Dec 31, 2019
Exterior LightingVisibility/wiper

MY LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS ARE EXTREMELY DIM. UPON DIAGNOSIS, THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH THE WIRING OR THE BULBS BUT THERE IS A DEFECT WITH THE HEADLIGHTS ON THE 2010 TO 2015 CADILLAC SRX'S. IT WAS EXPLAINED TO ME THAT THE SEAL FAILS AND ALLOWS MOISTURE IN THE HEADLIGHT WHICH CAUSES A HAZE TO BUILD UP IN THE ENCLOSED LIGHT COVER …

Read full complaint

MY LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS ARE EXTREMELY DIM. UPON DIAGNOSIS, THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH THE WIRING OR THE BULBS BUT THERE IS A DEFECT WITH THE HEADLIGHTS ON THE 2010 TO 2015 CADILLAC SRX'S. IT WAS EXPLAINED TO ME THAT THE SEAL FAILS AND ALLOWS MOISTURE IN THE HEADLIGHT WHICH CAUSES A HAZE TO BUILD UP IN THE ENCLOSED LIGHT COVER WHICH IN TURN MAKES THE LIGHTS DIM. I HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO DRIVE MY VEHICLE AT NIGHT BECAUSE I CAN'T EVEN TELL THAT THE LIGHTS ARE ON ESPECIALLY ON A DARK STREET OR HIGHWAY. WHEN I DID SOME RESEARCH AND SPOKE WITH GMC/CADILLAC I FOUND THAT GMC/CADILLAC HAS A RECALL ON THE HEADLIGHT ASSEMBLY IN TWO STATES ONLY-CALIFORNIA AND FLORIDA EVEN THOUGH THE PROBLEM IS MORE THAN LIKELY NATIONWIDE. THERE IS ALSO A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AGAINST CADILLAC/GMC FOR THIS DEFECT.

NHTSA ODI #11292309

78,000 miles · Dec 27, 2019
Exterior Lighting

WITH HEADLIGHTS ON LOW BEAM UNABLE TO SEE .HAVE TO DRIVE VEHICLE WITH HIGH BEAMS ON VERY UNSAFE.HAVE DONE RESEARCH ON INTERNET HAVE FOUND NUMEROUS COMPLAINTS .

NHTSA ODI #11291464

60,000 miles · Dec 14, 2019
Exterior Lighting

LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS ARE TERRIBLE. THEY ARE TOO DIM TO DRIVE AT NIGHT. IT SEEMS LIKE THERE ARE NO LIGHTS ON AT ALL.

NHTSA ODI #11289074

130,000 miles · Dec 12, 2019
Exterior Lighting

HEADLIGHTS HAVE BECOME SO DIM THAT THEY ARE NOT USABLE TO DRIVE. WHEN DRIVING AT NIGHT I MUST USE MY BRIGHTS TO SEE THE ROAD IN FRONT OF ME. CHANGING THE BULBS DID NOT MAKE A DIFFERENCE.

NHTSA ODI #11288765

25 miles · Dec 4, 2019
Exterior Lighting

WHEN DRIVING AT NIGHT USING THE LOW BEAMS YOU CANT SEE ANYTHING, IT LIKE NOT EVEN HAVING THEM ON. REPLACED BULBS STILL THE SAME.

NHTSA ODI #11286794

Official recalls

3

21V473000 · Suspension:rear

Jun 24, 2021

General Motors, LLC (GM) is recalling certain 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles. The rear suspension toe link adjuster may not have been tightened properly, which could result in a loose toe link.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A loose toe link can separate and cause a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Owners are advised to not drive their vehicle if they experience certain Malfunction Indicator Lamp (MIL) warnings or other issues, such as unusual steering behavior, while driving. Please see the Part 573 report for the full list of warnings. Dealers will replace the adjustable toe link with a non-adjustable one, free of charge. Interim owner notification letters were mailed August 6, 2021. Owner notification letters were mailed on October 25, 2021. Cadillac and Saab customers may direct questions to Cadillac customer service at 1-800-333-4223. GM's number for this recall is N212340980.

14V571000 · Suspension:rear

Sep 19, 2014

General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles manufactured April 14, 2009, to September 1, 2014, and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles manufactured February 1, 2011, to September 13, 2011. On the affected vehicles, the jam nut in the rear suspension toe adjuster link may not be torqued to the proper specification. A loose toe adjuster link can cause the vehicle to sway or wander at highway speeds. A loose toe adjuster link may lead to thread damage and eventual failure. Failure of the toe adjuster link will cause an abrupt change in the vehicle's alignment.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: Failure of the toe adjuster link could cause a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: GM will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the torque of the left and right rear toe link adjuster lock nuts, and replace the parts if there is evidence of damage or a loose link, free of charge. The The recall began November 11, 2014. Owners may contact Cadillac customer service at 1-800-458-8006 or Saab customer service at 1-800-955-9007. GM's number for this recall is 14457.

14V447000 · Seats:front Assembly:power Adjust

Jul 23, 2014

General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2011-2012 Buick LaCrosse, Regal and Chevrolet Camaro, as well as certain 2010-2012 Cadillac SRX, Chevrolet Equinox and GMC Terrain vehicles, equipped with power height adjustable driver and passenger seats. In the affected vehicles, the bolt that secures the driver's and passenger's power front seat height adjuster may fall out causing the seat to drop suddenly to the lowest vertical position.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If the driver's seat unexpectedly drops, the distraction and altered seat position may affect the drivers' control of the vehicle, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: GM will notify owners, and dealers will replace the height adjuster shoulder bolts, free of charge. The manufacturer distributed interim letters to owners on September 11, 2014. The recall began on December 26, 2014. Owners may contact GM customer service at 1-800-521-7300 (Buick), 1-800-458-8006 (Cadillac), 1-800-222-1020 (Chevrolet), or 1-800-462-8782 (GMC). GM's number for this recall is 14271.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

PE20019 · Rear Toe Link Adjuster Separation

Opened Nov 6, 2020 · Closed Dec 23, 2021

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Suspension; Suspension:rear

On November 06, 2020, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE20-019) to assess the remedy and scope of General Motors (GM) recall 14V-571. ODI had received a total of 9 complaints with allegations of rear toe links separating while the vehicle was in motion. There were 4 complainants indicating that the remedy for recall 14V-571 had been performed on their vehicle. The other 5 complaints were outside the original recall scope but exhibited the same failure mode as addressed by recall 14V-571 and reported uncontrolled swaying while driving.ODI's review focused on all 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles that experienced a rear toe link failure while the vehicle was in motion under various driving conditions. The failures were the same or similar to those addressed by the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. The remedy for recall 14V-571 was to inspect the rear toe link adjusters and replace them if necessary as well as tighten both jam nuts to a manufacturer specified torque. The remedy can be reversed when the vehicle gets a rear alignment adjustment and the jam nuts are not properly re-torqued to the manufacturer's specification. ODI's data review confirmed a high toe link failure rate in vehicles that either had and had not received the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. On June 24, 2021, GM filed a defect information report recalling all 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles to remedy the potential failure of the rear toe link adjuster while driving. The remedy replaces adjustable toe links with non-adjustable toe links. The recall (21V-473) includes vehicles that were remedied under 14V-571. In view of the recall action being taken by GM, ODI is closing this Preliminary Evaluation. NHTSA reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by future circumstances.The ODI complaints cited above can be viewed at www.nhtsa.gov.The ODI identification numbers for the complaints cited above can be found in a separate document attached to this closing resume.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Suspension

On November 06, 2020, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE20-019) to assess the remedy and scope of General Motors (GM) recall 14V-571. ODI had received a total of 9 complaints with allegations of rear toe links separating while the vehicle was in motion. There were 4 complainants indicating that the remedy for recall 14V-571 had been performed on their vehicle. The other 5 complaints were outside the original recall scope but exhibited the same failure mode as addressed by recall 14V-571 and reported uncontrolled swaying while driving.ODI's review focused on all 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles that experienced a rear toe link failure while the vehicle was in motion under various driving conditions. The failures were the same or similar to those addressed by the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. The remedy for recall 14V-571 was to inspect the rear toe link adjusters and replace them if necessary as well as tighten both jam nuts to a manufacturer specified torque. The remedy can be reversed when the vehicle gets a rear alignment adjustment and the jam nuts are not properly re-torqued to the manufacturer's specification. ODI's data review confirmed a high toe link failure rate in vehicles that either had and had not received the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. On June 24, 2021, GM filed a defect information report recalling all 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles to remedy the potential failure of the rear toe link adjuster while driving. The remedy replaces adjustable toe links with non-adjustable toe links. The recall (21V-473) includes vehicles that were remedied under 14V-571. In view of the recall action being taken by GM, ODI is closing this Preliminary Evaluation. NHTSA reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by future circumstances.The ODI complaints cited above can be viewed at www.nhtsa.gov.The ODI identification numbers for the complaints cited above can be found in a separate document attached to this closing resume.

Suspension:rear

On November 06, 2020, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE20-019) to assess the remedy and scope of General Motors (GM) recall 14V-571. ODI had received a total of 9 complaints with allegations of rear toe links separating while the vehicle was in motion. There were 4 complainants indicating that the remedy for recall 14V-571 had been performed on their vehicle. The other 5 complaints were outside the original recall scope but exhibited the same failure mode as addressed by recall 14V-571 and reported uncontrolled swaying while driving.ODI's review focused on all 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles that experienced a rear toe link failure while the vehicle was in motion under various driving conditions. The failures were the same or similar to those addressed by the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. The remedy for recall 14V-571 was to inspect the rear toe link adjusters and replace them if necessary as well as tighten both jam nuts to a manufacturer specified torque. The remedy can be reversed when the vehicle gets a rear alignment adjustment and the jam nuts are not properly re-torqued to the manufacturer's specification. ODI's data review confirmed a high toe link failure rate in vehicles that either had and had not received the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. On June 24, 2021, GM filed a defect information report recalling all 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles to remedy the potential failure of the rear toe link adjuster while driving. The remedy replaces adjustable toe links with non-adjustable toe links. The recall (21V-473) includes vehicles that were remedied under 14V-571. In view of the recall action being taken by GM, ODI is closing this Preliminary Evaluation. NHTSA reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by future circumstances.The ODI complaints cited above can be viewed at www.nhtsa.gov.The ODI identification numbers for the complaints cited above can be found in a separate document attached to this closing resume.