← New search

2004 Buick Rainier

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Similar to other model years

Owner complaints for the 2004 Buick Rainier do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 91.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

133 reports with mileage · 25 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Electrical System. Review the 83 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Exterior Lighting. Review the 21 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Power Train. Review the 15 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

9 crash reports4 fire reports5 injury reports

What owners actually said

158 reports
Mileage unknown · Aug 3, 2009
Electrical System

I HAVE A 2004 BUICK RAINIER AND THE SPEEDOMETER STICKS ON A REGULAR BASIS. IT RANGES ANYWHERE FROM 20-70 MILES AN HOUR WHILE PARKED AND 120 AND OVER WHILE DRIVING. I CAN GENERALLY TELL ABOUT HOW FAST I AM GOING AND MUST KEEP AN EYE ON MY RPMS. WELL THIS IS FRUSTRATING AND VERY DISTRACTING WHILE DRIVING. THIS IS DEFINITELY A SAFE…

Read full complaint

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

NHTSA ODI #10279160

69,000 miles · May 21, 2009
Electrical System

2004 BUICK RAINIER SPEEDOMETER IS REGISTERING 25-30 MPH FASTER THAN WHAT THE VEHICLE IS ACTUALLY TRAVELING. WHEN IN PARK IS SHOWS THE SUV TRAVELING 25 MPH. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10269583

40,000 miles · May 17, 2009
Electrical System

INSTRUMENT CLUSTER FAILED TO WORK. DEALER CHECKED AND FOUND THIS IS NOT A SAFETY ISSUE, SINCE I SHOULD BE ABLE TO FEEL HOE FAST I AM GOING. THIS SAME FAILURE WAS COVERED IN PONTIACS AND CHEVROLET TRUCKS. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10268991

62,000 miles · Apr 25, 2009
Air BagsCrashInjury

WHILE TRAVELING AT A SPEED OF APPROX 50-55 ON A INTERSTATE, I WAS REARED ENDED BY A AUTO, MY AUTO WAS STRUCK THEN SHOVELED INTO A CEMENT WALL BLOCK AND THEN BOUNCED INTO ON COMING TRAFFIC TO THE OTHER CEMENT WALL BLOCK ON THE OPPOSITE SITE WHILE TRYING TO STOP, I WAS WEARING A SEAT BELT, THE VEHICLE'S AIR BAGS DIDN'T GO OFF AT …

Read full complaint

WHILE TRAVELING AT A SPEED OF APPROX 50-55 ON A INTERSTATE, I WAS REARED ENDED BY A AUTO, MY AUTO WAS STRUCK THEN SHOVELED INTO A CEMENT WALL BLOCK AND THEN BOUNCED INTO ON COMING TRAFFIC TO THE OTHER CEMENT WALL BLOCK ON THE OPPOSITE SITE WHILE TRYING TO STOP, I WAS WEARING A SEAT BELT, THE VEHICLE'S AIR BAGS DIDN'T GO OFF AT ALL IN THE VEHICLE. A HEAD INJURY OCCURRED, NECK AND SHOULDER INJURIES OCCURRED. THE AUTO WAS A TOTAL LOSS! *TR

NHTSA ODI #10266690

33,000 miles · Apr 15, 2009
Electrical SystemVehicle Speed Control

MY HUSBAND AND I PURCHASED A USED 2004 BUICK RAINIER WITH 33,000 MILES LAST MAY 2008. ONE EVENING DURING THE SUMMER WE WERE MAKING A 20 MINUTE TRIP AND THE SPEEDOMETER JUST STOPPED WORKING WHILE EN ROUTE. SINCE THEN THE SPEEDOMETER GETS STUCK WHILE MAKING 20+ MINUTE TRIPS AND WILL ONLY GO DOWN 5 MPH EACH TIME YOU SHUT OFF THE …

Read full complaint

MY HUSBAND AND I PURCHASED A USED 2004 BUICK RAINIER WITH 33,000 MILES LAST MAY 2008. ONE EVENING DURING THE SUMMER WE WERE MAKING A 20 MINUTE TRIP AND THE SPEEDOMETER JUST STOPPED WORKING WHILE EN ROUTE. SINCE THEN THE SPEEDOMETER GETS STUCK WHILE MAKING 20+ MINUTE TRIPS AND WILL ONLY GO DOWN 5 MPH EACH TIME YOU SHUT OFF THE SUV AND RESTART. SO YOU HAVE TO SHUT OFF AND RESTART SEVERAL TIMES BEFORE IT REACHES BACK DOWN TO ZERO AND IT WILL THEN OPERATE OKAY FOR A LITTLE WHILE UNTIL YOU MAKE THAT 20+ MINUTE TRIP AGAIN. SOMETIMES WHILE JUST DRIVING AROUND TOWN RUNNING ERRANDS IT WILL GET STUCK. SO I WOULD SAY AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK IT GETS STUCK. IT'S VERY FRUSTRATING WHEN YOU HAVE TO WATCH YOUR SPEED ESPECIALLY AROUND THE SCHOOL ZONES. I OFTEN TAKE MY EYES OFF THE ROADS TO WATCH MY RPM'S AND TRY TO CALCULATE HOW FAST I'M GOING. I'M CURRENTLY SAVING TO HAVE THE PROBLEM FIXED AS I'VE HEARD OF IT BEING A VERY PRICING ITEM (INSTRUMENT CLUSTER) TO HAVE REPLACED. I'VE BEEN DOING SOME RESEARCH ON A POSSIBLE RECALL FOR THIS ITEM AND I'VE FOUND THERE HAVE BEEN MANY COMPLAINTS AND EVEN A CLASS ACTION SUIT AGAINST GM FOR OTHER SUV'S SIMILAR TO THE RAINIER BUT THE BUICK RAINIER WAS NOT LISTED IN THIS CLASS ACTION SUIT AND NO RECALLS HAVE BEEN MADE FOR THIS ITEM ON BUICK RAINIERS. ANY HELP YOU CAN GIVE WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10265459

29,000 miles · Apr 15, 2009
Electrical System

THE DASH CLUSTER LIGHTING IS TOO DIM IN THE DAYLIGHT AND NON EXISTENT AT DAWN AND DUSK. THERE IS NOT A MANUAL OVERRIDE THAT ALLOWS YOU TO SELECT NIGHT LIGHTING DURING THESE TRANSITIONAL TIMES AND ON CERTAIN DAYS SO YOU CAN NOT SEE THE SPEEDOMETER OUTPUT NOR THE DRIVER ADVISORY DISPLAY. I DISCUSSED IT WITH SEVERAL DEALERS AND…

Read full complaint

THE DASH CLUSTER LIGHTING IS TOO DIM IN THE DAYLIGHT AND NON EXISTENT AT DAWN AND DUSK. THERE IS NOT A MANUAL OVERRIDE THAT ALLOWS YOU TO SELECT NIGHT LIGHTING DURING THESE TRANSITIONAL TIMES AND ON CERTAIN DAYS SO YOU CAN NOT SEE THE SPEEDOMETER OUTPUT NOR THE DRIVER ADVISORY DISPLAY. I DISCUSSED IT WITH SEVERAL DEALERS AND THEY SAY SOME WORK THIS WAY AND SOME DON'T. THEY HAVE NO WAY TO TELL WHICH WORK PROPERLY AND WHICH ONES WILL NOT. THEY ALL REFUSED TO REPLACE IT UNDER WARRANTY AS BUICK SAYS THAT IS THE WAY THE SYSTEM IS SUPPOSED TO WORK. FOR UP TO 15 MINUTES IN MORNING AND NIGHT THE DISPLAY IS TOTALLY UNREADABLE WHILE IT IS SLOWLY TRANSITIONING NIGHT TIME VISIBILITY. YES, I HAVE THE LIGHTING SET AS BRIGHT AS THE SYSTEM WILL ALLOW AT ANY GIVEN TIME BUT IT IS STILL NOT VISIBLE TO ME OR ANYONE ELSE THAT DRIVES THE CAR. I HAVE FOUND QUITE A FEW OTHERS ON THE NET THAT HAVE THE SAME PROBLEM AND THE SAME COULD CARE LESS RESPONSES FROM BUICK ON THIS SAFETY ISSUE. THIS GOES ON EVERYDAY SO IT PROBABLY IS ONLY A MATTER OF TIME UNTIL IT RESULTS IN A SERIOUS ACCIDENT AND/OR A SERIOUS MECHANICAL FAILURE THAT WILL BE MISSED BECAUSE YOU CAN'T READ THE INSTRUMENT CLUSTER UNDER CERTAIN BUT DAILY CONDITIONS SUCH AS SUNRISE AND DUSK. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10265402

50,950 miles · Feb 10, 2009
Electrical SystemExterior Lighting

I HAVE HAD TROUBLE WITH THE HEADLIGHTS DIMMING WHILE DRIVING SINCE THE BEGINNING, THE DEALERSHIP HAS SEVERAL TIMES WORKED ON THE PROBLEM, WHICH I THINK HAS CLEARED UP..SO FAR. NOW MY SPEEDOMETER HAS STARTED MESSING UP, IT SAYS I AM GOING 50 WHILE PARKED AND 120 WHILE DRIVING. I ONLY DRIVE SHORT DISTANCES AND MOSTLY INTO AND BA…

Read full complaint

I HAVE HAD TROUBLE WITH THE HEADLIGHTS DIMMING WHILE DRIVING SINCE THE BEGINNING, THE DEALERSHIP HAS SEVERAL TIMES WORKED ON THE PROBLEM, WHICH I THINK HAS CLEARED UP..SO FAR. NOW MY SPEEDOMETER HAS STARTED MESSING UP, IT SAYS I AM GOING 50 WHILE PARKED AND 120 WHILE DRIVING. I ONLY DRIVE SHORT DISTANCES AND MOSTLY INTO AND BACK FROM TOWN 6 MILE ONE WAY. I HAVE 50,969 MILES ON MY 2004 VEHICLE, I KEEP ITS CHECKUPS AND OIL CHANGES REGULARLY: DEALERSHIP HAS RECORDS. I FEEL THIS VEHICLE HAS HAD ELECTRICAL ISSUES FROM DAY ONE, I SEE TURN SIGNAL AND BRAKELIGHT ISSUES IN RECALL SO I DON'T BELIEVE I AM WRONG ABOUT THIS. THEY WANT TO CHARGE ME OVER $400 TO CHANGE THE "CLUSTER" AS THE ECONOMY GOES, I TOO CANNOT AFFORD THIS KIND OF CHARGES ON AN ITEM THAT SHOULD NOT HAVE ISSUES. ESPECIALLY WHEN I TAKE GOOD CARE OF IT AND REALLY HAS LOW MILEAGE AND WEAR AND TEAR (PERFECT CONDITION). *TR

NHTSA ODI #10258193

59,142 miles · Jan 8, 2009
Electrical System

SPEEDOMETER STOPS WORKING WHEN CAR WARMS UP. AS I AM DRIVING WITH MY TWO SMALL CHILDREN MY SPEEDOMETER WILL STOP WORKING AND GO BELOW ZERO. WHICH BECOMES A HAZARD BECAUSE I AM UNAWARE OF HOW FAST OR SLOW I AM GOING. MY FAMILY AS WELL AS MYSELF ARE IN SERIOUS DANGER OF GETTING INTO AN ACCIDENT BECAUSE OF THIS PROBLEM. IT WILL…

Read full complaint

SPEEDOMETER STOPS WORKING WHEN CAR WARMS UP. AS I AM DRIVING WITH MY TWO SMALL CHILDREN MY SPEEDOMETER WILL STOP WORKING AND GO BELOW ZERO. WHICH BECOMES A HAZARD BECAUSE I AM UNAWARE OF HOW FAST OR SLOW I AM GOING. MY FAMILY AS WELL AS MYSELF ARE IN SERIOUS DANGER OF GETTING INTO AN ACCIDENT BECAUSE OF THIS PROBLEM. IT WILL NOT START WORKING AGAIN UNTIL THE NEXT DAY. IT HAS BEEN HAPPENING QUICKER AND QUICKER AS THE PROBLEM PERSISTS. I AM ALSO NOTICING A HOT SMELL WHEN THE SPEEDOMETER STOPS WORKING. BUICK REFUSES TO HELP WITH THIS PROBLEM EVEN THOUGH I HAVE REPORTED THIS BEFORE MY EXTENDED WARRANTY EXPIRED. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10254309

64,000 miles · Dec 2, 2008
Electrical System

WHILE DRIVING ON THE FREEWAY I NOTICED THAT THE SPEEDOMETER READING WAS TOO HIGH AS I WAS CHANGING LANES TO EXIT DURING EVENING RUSH HOUR. AFTER EXITING AND STOPPING FOR A TRAFFIC LIGHT, MY SPEEDOMETER WAS SHOWING 55MPH. AS I CONTINUED ON THE SERVICE DRIVE I OBSERVED 75 AND 85MPH IN A 35MPH ZONE! VERY DISTRACTING WHEN DRIVING…

Read full complaint

WHILE DRIVING ON THE FREEWAY I NOTICED THAT THE SPEEDOMETER READING WAS TOO HIGH AS I WAS CHANGING LANES TO EXIT DURING EVENING RUSH HOUR. AFTER EXITING AND STOPPING FOR A TRAFFIC LIGHT, MY SPEEDOMETER WAS SHOWING 55MPH. AS I CONTINUED ON THE SERVICE DRIVE I OBSERVED 75 AND 85MPH IN A 35MPH ZONE! VERY DISTRACTING WHEN DRIVING NEXT TO A 70MPH FREEWAY. I NOT GOING THAT FAST I'M CRAWLING. WHEN I TURNED ON TO MY STREET I WAS STILL OBSERVING THE SPEED AT 65MPH AND NEARLY RAN OVER MY NEIGHBOR WHO WAS PUTTING HIS TRASH OUT AT THE CURB. ALMOST PASSED MY DRIVEWAY AND DROVE OVER A BIT OF THE OTHER NEIGHBORS GRASS. I COULD NOT BELIEVE A 4-YR OLD VEHICLE WITH 64000 MILES HAD A BAD SPEEDOMETER. SO I CHANGED THE INSTRUMENT CLUSTER FUSE AND THE SPEEDOMETER STARTED TO WORK AGAIN AND SEEMED TO BE ACCURATE. ON MY WAY HOME FROM WORK IT AGAIN SHOT UP TO 120+MPH AND THAT IS WHERE IT STAYED. CHANGED THE FUSE AGAIN SEEMED TO WORK FOR A DAY AND SHOT UP AGAIN TO 120+ MPH. DROVE IT TO THE DEALERSHIP TO HAVE TO REPAIRED AND THEY SAY IT IS THE INSTRUMENT CLUSTER THAT IS BAD AND IT WILL COST $450.00. NO LONGER UNDER WARRANTY AND I CANNOT REPAIR AT THIS TIME. DEALERSHIP SERVICE SAYS THEY HAVE NOT HEARD OF THIS HAPPENING AT ALL. FOR MY MONEY THEY WILL ONLY WARRANTY IT FOR 1YR/12000 MILES. I HAVE ALWAYS BELIEVED BUY AMERICAN BUT RIGHT NOW I AM TRULY DISAPPOINTED. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10250481

28,000 miles · Oct 1, 2008
Power Train

I HAVE A 2004 BUICK RAINIER THAT HAD THE TRANSMISSION REBUILT WITH 28,000 MILES AND AGAIN AT 64,000 MILES. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10244167

Official recalls

2

05V198000 · Exterior Lighting:turn Signal

May 5, 2005

ON CERTAIN TRUCKS AND SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES, THE DRIVER WISHING TO SIGNAL A TURN BY MOVING THE DIRECTIONAL SIGNAL LEVER, (UP OR DOWN) MAY CAUSE THE FRONT MARKER/TURN LIGHTS AND REAR TURN LIGHTS TO FLASH IN A MANNER SIMILAR TO HAZARD WARNING, RATHER THAN FLASHING ON THE DESIRED SIDE ONLY.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: THE DRIVER MAY NOT BE ABLE TO CLEARLY SIGNAL THEIR INTENTIONS TO TURN, CHANGE TRAVEL LANES, OR POTENTIALLY WARN OTHERS OF AN IMPAIRED VEHICLE OPERATING CONDITION INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE SUSPECT FLASHER MODULES WITH A NEW FLASHER MODULE DESIGNED WITH SEALED RELAYS AND MORE DURABLE CONTACT MATERIAL INSIDE OF THE RELAYS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON AUGUST 4, 2005. ISUZU BEGAN MAILING OWNER LETTERS ON AUGUST 4, 2005. OWNERS MAY CONTACT CHEVROLET AT 1-800-630-2438, GMC AT 1-866-996-9463, ISUZU AT 1-800-255-6727, BUICK AT 1-866-608-8080, AND OLDSMOBILE AT 1-800-630-6537.

04V527000 · Exterior Lighting:brake Lights

Nov 1, 2004

ON CERTAIN SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES, VIBRATION AND HEAT MAY CAUSE THE TAIL LAMP/STOP LAMP BULB TO LOOSEN IN ITS SOCKET. IF THIS OCCURS, THE BULB MAY FLICKER AND EVENTUALLY BECOME INOPERATIVE.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: AN INOPERATIVE BRAKE LAMP WILL NOT CONVEY THE DRIVER'S INTENTION OF STOPPING TO DRIVERS IN FOLLOWING VEHICLES, AND AN INOPERATIVE REAR TURN SIGNAL LAMP WILL NOT CONVEY THE DRIVER'S INTENTION TO TURN TO DRIVERS IN FOLLOWING VEHICLES. BOTH OF THESE FAILURES CAN INCREASE THE RISK OF A CRASH.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE TAIL LAMP/STOP LAMP ASSEMBLIES, AND IF NECESSARY, REPLACE THEM. THE RECALL BEGAN ON NOVEMBER 22, 2004. OWNERS SHOULD CONTACT CHEVROLET AT 1-800-630-2438, OLDSMOBILE AT 1-800-630-6537, BUICK AT 1-866-608-8080, OR GMC AT 1-866-996-9463.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

3

RQ17002 · Loss Of Headlights

Opened Apr 24, 2017 · Closed Mar 29, 2021

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Exterior Lighting:headlights

The subject vehicles are model year (MY) 2002-2009 Chevrolet Trailblazer, GMC Envoy, 2004-2007 Buick Rainier, 2003-2008 Isuzu Ascender, 2005-2009 Saab 9-7X, 2002-2004 Oldsmobile Bravada, 2003-2006 Chevrolet SSR, 2005-2009 Buick Lacrosse, and 2006-2008 Pontiac Grand Prix. This scope includes the Trailblazer/Envoy variants: 2002-2006 Envoy XL/Trailblazer EXT and 2004-2005 Envoy XUV. The original scope of this investigation was expanded to include all vehicles equipped with the subject Headlight Driver Module (HDM). The focus of the investigation was to determine whether actions performed by General Motors adequately addressed any unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety in the subject vehicles concerning the headlights and the HDM that controls them.Under normal electrical load and environmental conditions, the HDM can overheat inside the Underhood Electrical Center (UEC). This can cause the module to fail and result in a simultaneous loss of both low beam headlights and both daytime running lights (DRLs), often with no warning or prior detectability to the driver. This failure can be intermittent or permanent. No other exterior lights are affected. High beams, turn signals, brake lights, and reverse lights are still operational.General Motors addressed this issue with 2 recalls (14V755 & 15V519) and a special coverage program (N172091910). In view of the recalls and special coverage program implemented by GM and the vehicle high beams continuing to operate, ODI has tentatively concluded that the actions taken by GM mitigate any unreasonable risk to safety posed by HDM failure in the subject vehicles.Accordingly, the investigation is closed. The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by new circumstances.The ODI reports cited above are available for review online at NHTSA.gov under the identification numbers in the attached document.

EA07009 · Fuel Pump Module Leaks Gasoline

Opened Jul 10, 2007 · Closed Aug 28, 2008

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Fuel System, Gasoline:delivery:fuel Pump

DURING THE COURSE OF THIS EA INVESTIGATION, ODI OBSERVED THAT THE MAJORITY OF THE COMPLAINTS (88%) AND WARRANTY CLAIMS (94%) WERE REPORTED FOR VEHICLES THAT ARE REGISTERED FOR USE IN THE SALT BELT REGION OF THE US.THIS AREA INCLUDES 20 STATES IN THE NORTHEAST, MID ATLANTIC AND THE MIDWEST REGIONS AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.CONSUMERS IN THE SALT BELT REGION REPORTED TO ODI THAT THEY COULD SMELL FUEL VAPORS IN THEIR VEHICLES WHILE DRIVING.UPON FURTHER EXAMINATION OF THEIR VEHICLES, THEY DISCOVERED THAT FUEL VAPORS WERE COMING OUT OF THE TOP OF THE FUEL TANK. THIS CONDITION IS CAUSED BY CORROSION OF THE RETURN AND SENDER LINES OF THE FUEL PUMP MODULE.WATER AND ROAD SALT COLLECT ON TOP OF THE FUEL PUMP LEADING TO SMALL PINHOLES APPEARING ON THE FUEL LINES.FUEL MAY LEAK AND COLLECT ON TOP OF THE MODULE AND/OR SPILL ONTO THE GROUND.THE DATA EVALUATED UNDER THIS INVESTIGATION REFLECT A RELATIVELY LOW FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE THAT LARGELY ARISES IN SALT BELT STATES.GM HAS EXTENDED THE WARRANTY ON THE SUBJECT COMPONENT TO TEN YEARS OR 120,000 MILES.FURTHER USE OF AGENCY RESOURCES DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE WARRANTED AT THIS TIME; ACCORDINGLY, THIS INVESTIGATION IS CLOSED.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT NO SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT EXISTS.THE AGENCY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO TAKE FURTHER ACTION IF WARRANTED BY THE CIRCUMSTANCES.FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SELECT DOCUMENT SEARCH.

EA04021 · Brake Lamp Failure

Opened Aug 3, 2004 · Closed Nov 4, 2004

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Exterior Lighting:brake Lights

GM STATES THAT SOME BRAKE/TAIL LAMP BULBS CAN PREMATURELY BECOME INOPERATIVE DUE TO MALFUNCTIONING BRAKE/TAIL LAMP SOCKETS.ON MARCH 2, 2004, GM INITIATED A 6-YEAR/72,000 MILE SPECIAL POLICY FOR 989,487 SUBJECT VEHICLES TO INSPECT AND REPLACE THE REAR BRAKE/TAIL LAMP BULB SOCKET ASSEMBLIES.ON APRIL 4, 2004, THE OFFICE OF DEFECTS INVESTIGATION (ODI) OPENED A PRELIMINARY EVALUATION (PE04-032) BASED ON CONSUMER COMPLAINTS ALLEGING BRAKE LIGHTS NOT OPERATING WHEN THE BRAKE PEDAL IS DEPRESSED.ON AUGUST 3, 2004 ODI UPGRADED PE04-032 TO AN ENGINEERING ANALYSIS (EA04-021).BY LETTER DATED OCTOBER 27, 2004 GM NOTIFIED NHTSA THAT IT WILL CONDUCT A SAFETY RECALL (NHTSA # 04V527) COVERING SUBJECT VEHICLES THAT WERE NOT ALREADY REPAIRED UNDER GM'S SPECIAL POLICY.MY 2004 SUBJECT VEHICLES BUILT AFTER AUGUST 8, 2003 CONTAIN IMPROVED BRAKE LAMP ASSEMBLIES AND ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL.GM DEALERS WILL INSTALL THE IMPROVED BRAKE LAMP ASSEMBLY ON SUBJECT VEHICLES BUILT ON AUGUST 8, 2003 AND EARLIER.THE ACTION TAKEN BY GM IS SUFFICIENT TO RESOLVE THE ISSUES RAISED BY THIS INVESTIGATION.ACCORDINGLY, THIS INVESTIGATION IS CLOSED.