DT: THE CONTACT'S VEHICLE HAD FIVE DIFFERENT ELECTRICAL WINDOW FAILURES. THE WINDOWS COULD NOT BE ROLLED UP OR DOWN BECAUSE THE BELT INSIDE THE WINDOW BROKE. THE DEALER REPAIRED THE WINDOWS. THE MANUFACTURER ADVISED THE CONTACT TO TAKE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER FOR REPAIRS. THEY OFFERED NO FREE REMEDY. *AK
2000 Buick Lesabre
Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations
More warning signs than most Lesabre years
Owner complaints for the 2000 Buick Lesabre are substantially higher than the model-year median of 24.
About this comparison →How this year compares
Owner complaints by model year
Compare all Lesabre years →Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.
What owners reported most
All reported categories
Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
349 reports with mileage · 320 unknown
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
- Visibility. Review the 244 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Electrical System. Review the 87 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Engine And Engine Cooling. Review the 78 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
Visibility complaints
244 reportsWE PURCHASED OUR 2000 LESABRE AS A PROGRAM CAR WITH 12,000 MILES. BEGINNING SHORTLY THEREAFTER THREE POWER WIDOWS WENT OUT. THEY WERE REPLACED AT NO CHARGE. NOW WITH 85,000 MILE THE FOURTH WENT OUT AND IT COST US $400 PLUS DOLLARS. OF COURSE THEY SAID IT WAS OUT OF WARRANTY BECAUSE OF THE MILEAGE. WE HAD OVER NINE CARS WIT…
Read full complaint
WE PURCHASED OUR 2000 LESABRE AS A PROGRAM CAR WITH 12,000 MILES. BEGINNING SHORTLY THEREAFTER THREE POWER WIDOWS WENT OUT. THEY WERE REPLACED AT NO CHARGE. NOW WITH 85,000 MILE THE FOURTH WENT OUT AND IT COST US $400 PLUS DOLLARS. OF COURSE THEY SAID IT WAS OUT OF WARRANTY BECAUSE OF THE MILEAGE. WE HAD OVER NINE CARS WITH POWER WINDOWS AND NEVER HAD TO REPLACE ONE, AND NOW ONE VEHICLE ALL FOUR HAD TO BE REPLACED. TO ME THAT TELLS ME THAT THERE WAS A PROBLEM WITH THE WINDOW MOTORS. I COULD UNDERSTAND ONE GOING OUT, BUT ALL FOUR? *NM
DT:THE CONTACT HAD THE WINDOW REGULATOR REPLACED THREE TIMES. THE FIRST TIME WAS THE RIGHT FRONT WINDOW, THE SECOND TIME WAS THE RIGHT REAR WINDOW, AND THIRD TIME WAS THE LEFT REAR WINDOW. THE FIRST TWO TIMES THEY WERE REPLACED UNDER WARRANTY, THE THIRD TIME IT WAS AT THE CONSUMERS EXPENSE. ALSO, WAS HAVING A PROBLEM WIT…
Read full complaint
DT:THE CONTACT HAD THE WINDOW REGULATOR REPLACED THREE TIMES. THE FIRST TIME WAS THE RIGHT FRONT WINDOW, THE SECOND TIME WAS THE RIGHT REAR WINDOW, AND THIRD TIME WAS THE LEFT REAR WINDOW. THE FIRST TWO TIMES THEY WERE REPLACED UNDER WARRANTY, THE THIRD TIME IT WAS AT THE CONSUMERS EXPENSE. ALSO, WAS HAVING A PROBLEM WITH WINDSHIELD WIPER BLADE POST ON BOTH SIDES. WHILE DRIVING DURING A RAIN STORM ON THE INTERSTATE, THE WINDSHIELD WIPER ON THE DRIVER'S SIDE STOPPED WORKING AND ON THE PASSENGER'S SIDE IT WORKED INTERMITTENTLY. THE WINDSHIELD WIPERS WERE REPAIRED UNDER WARRANTY. *AK UPDATED 11/16/05. *JB
CAR WAS BOUGHT BRAND NEW BY MY WIFE'S PARENTS WHO SHORTLY THEREAFTER DIED AND WE INHERITED CAR. GARAGE KEPT AND HARDLY USED. AFTER WE HAD IT 1 YEAR WHEN MY WIFE TRIED TO PUT HER PASSENGER SIDE WINDOW DOWN IT WOULDN'T GO DOWN. I THOUGHT THE MOTOR HAD GONE BAD AND PREPARED TO TAKE IT TO THE DEALER. BEFORE APPOINTMENT I AVOIDED …
Read full complaint
CAR WAS BOUGHT BRAND NEW BY MY WIFE'S PARENTS WHO SHORTLY THEREAFTER DIED AND WE INHERITED CAR. GARAGE KEPT AND HARDLY USED. AFTER WE HAD IT 1 YEAR WHEN MY WIFE TRIED TO PUT HER PASSENGER SIDE WINDOW DOWN IT WOULDN'T GO DOWN. I THOUGHT THE MOTOR HAD GONE BAD AND PREPARED TO TAKE IT TO THE DEALER. BEFORE APPOINTMENT I AVOIDED USING THAT WINDOW AND ONE DAY TRIED TO OPEN THE BACK DRIVER'S SIDE WINDOW. IT WENT DOWN BUT MADE A NOISE AND NEVER WAS ABLE TO COME UP. I THOUGHT AGAIN IT WAS JUST BAD LUCK. THE FOLLOWING SUNDAY I WAS AT A STORE WITH ANOTHER CAR AND NOTICE A CAR THAT LOOKED EXACTLY LIKE OUR BUICK WITH TAPE ON IT'S REAR WINDOW. I THOUGHT MY WIFE HAD DRIVEN OUR BUICK TO THE STORE. IT WASN'T OUR CAR SO I WAITED FOR OWNER AND QUESTIONED HIM ABOUT HAVING PROBLEMS WITH HIS WINDOWS. IT WAS THE SECOND WINDOW THAT HAD BROKEN ON HIM. FURTHER INVESTIGATING ON INTERNET AND WITH OTHERS AWARE OF THE CAR FOUND THAT THERE ARE MANY WITH PROBLEM. I CALL BUICK WHO SAID CAR WAS OUT OF WARRANTY BUT WHEN I TOLD THEM I HAD BEEN TO YOUR WEBSITE TO FILE A COMPLAINT BUICK SAID IF I TOOK IT TO DEALER, AND WAS WILLING TO PAY FOR A DIAGNOSIS THEY WOULD DETERMINE WHETHER THEY COULD HELP ME. TURNS OUT THE CAR NEEDS A REGULATOR AND MOTOR CABLE AND GUIDE:L COST $400.00. DOESN'T THIS SEEM LIKE A MANUFACTURER DEFECT ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY FIX THE PROBLEM WITH THE SAME PART AND IT GOES BAD TOO. GO TO WWW.AUTOBYTEL.COM AND LOOKED AT ALL THE COMPLAINTS ON THAT WEBSITE OVER THIS SAME ISSUE. WE OPENED THE REAR WINDOWS MAYBE A HANDFUL OF TIMES BECAUSE THE CAR HAD AIR CONDITIONING AND WE USUALLY USED THE AIR. NOW 2 OF THE WINDOWS HAVE PROBLEM. IT IS DEFINITELY A SAFETY HAZARD IF YOU CAN'T OPEN THE WINDOW OR CAN'T CLOSE IT. WHAT IF A CHILD LOCKS THE DOORS WHILE IN THE CAR WITH THE KEYS AND CAN'T OPEN CAR WITH HANDLE. BUICK'S ACTIONS INDICATES THAT THEY KNOW THEY HAVE A PROBLEM. I CALLED THEM WITH THE DIAGNOSIS BUT BUICK HAS NOT CALLED BACK AND IMPRESSION IS THAT THEY DON'T WANT TO DEAL WITH IT. *JB
WE PURCHASED A NEW 2000 BUICK LASABRE FROM MIKE SHAW BUICK DEALERSHIP, 1080 S. COLORADO BLVD., DENVER, CO 80222 ON 9-13-1999. APRIL 2005 THE PASSENGER SIDE FRONT WINDOW REGULATOR FAILED. MIKE SHAW DEALERSHIP DID THE REPAIRS. THEY DID WAIVE THE LABOR FOR THIS, BECAUSE WE FELT AND STILL DO, THAT THIS IS A MECHANICAL DEFECT. BIL…
Read full complaint
WE PURCHASED A NEW 2000 BUICK LASABRE FROM MIKE SHAW BUICK DEALERSHIP, 1080 S. COLORADO BLVD., DENVER, CO 80222 ON 9-13-1999. APRIL 2005 THE PASSENGER SIDE FRONT WINDOW REGULATOR FAILED. MIKE SHAW DEALERSHIP DID THE REPAIRS. THEY DID WAIVE THE LABOR FOR THIS, BECAUSE WE FELT AND STILL DO, THAT THIS IS A MECHANICAL DEFECT. BILL $310.35. SEPT. 13, 2005, ANOTHER WINDOW FAILED, SAME PROBLEM, ONLY THIS WAS THE REAR DRIVER'S SIDE WINDOW. AGAIN WE HAD THE REPAIRS MADE AT MIKE SHAW DEALERSHIP, BUT THIS TIME THEY WOULD NOT GIVE US ANY SATISFACTION ON THIS BILL OF $483.38. WE FEEL THAT THIS IS A MECHANICAL DEFECT. THE EXACT SAME THING HAS HAPPENED ON ANOTHER BUICK OWNED BY OUR SON. IF NEEDED I CAN FORWARD COPIES OF THESE INVOICES TO YOU. *JB
THE ELECTRIC WINDOWS MECHANISM FAILS RESULTING IN REPLACEMENT AT $500 PER WINDOW EACH TIME. ALL FOUR WINDOW MECHANISMS HAVE HAD TO BE REPLACED IN A 2 YR. PERIOD. NOW THE DRIVER'S SIDE WINDOW WORKS AT TIMES, AND WILL NOT WORK AT TIMES. THIS WILL BE THE 5TH WINDOW REPLACEMENT. RIDICULOUS THAT THERE IS NO RECALL ON THESE MECHAN…
Read full complaint
THE ELECTRIC WINDOWS MECHANISM FAILS RESULTING IN REPLACEMENT AT $500 PER WINDOW EACH TIME. ALL FOUR WINDOW MECHANISMS HAVE HAD TO BE REPLACED IN A 2 YR. PERIOD. NOW THE DRIVER'S SIDE WINDOW WORKS AT TIMES, AND WILL NOT WORK AT TIMES. THIS WILL BE THE 5TH WINDOW REPLACEMENT. RIDICULOUS THAT THERE IS NO RECALL ON THESE MECHANISMS. A FRIEND HAS THE SAME VEHICLE AND HE HAS HAD TO REPLACE HIS ALSO. *JB
FOR THE 7TH TIME SINCE I HAVE OWNED THIS VEHICLE, A WINDOW HAS FALLEN DOWN INTO THE DOOR. THIS HAS BEEN A RECURRING PROBLEM SINCE I PURCHASED THE VEHICLE NEW IN 2000. UP UNTIL NOW I HAVE NOT HAD TO PAY FOR THE REPAIRS, BUT THIS ONE IS GOING TO COST $400. THE DEALER STATES THE GUARANTEE IS ONLY GOOD FOR ONE YEAR, SO I MAY HAVE…
Read full complaint
FOR THE 7TH TIME SINCE I HAVE OWNED THIS VEHICLE, A WINDOW HAS FALLEN DOWN INTO THE DOOR. THIS HAS BEEN A RECURRING PROBLEM SINCE I PURCHASED THE VEHICLE NEW IN 2000. UP UNTIL NOW I HAVE NOT HAD TO PAY FOR THE REPAIRS, BUT THIS ONE IS GOING TO COST $400. THE DEALER STATES THE GUARANTEE IS ONLY GOOD FOR ONE YEAR, SO I MAY HAVE TO PAY $1,600 A YEAR TO KEEP MY WINDOWS IN WORKING ORDER. I FEEL THIS IS UNREASONABLE AND THERE SHOULD BE A RECALL TO PERMANENTLY FIX THE PROBLEM.
ALL FOUR ELECTRIC WINDOWS FAILED. THE FIRST ONE WAS 3 MONTHS AFTER WARRANTY EXPIRED. THE LAST ONE WAS JUNE OF 2005. THE COST TO REPAIR THESE WAS IN EXCESS OF $1500. *NM
DT: THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE BACK DRIVER'S SIDE WINDOW WAS FAULTY. SHE TRIED TO ROLL THE WINDOW UP WHEN SHE HEARD A CLICKING NOISE AND THE WINDOW WOULD NOT GO UP OR DOWN. DEALER SAID THE REGULATOR NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. PART WAS REPLACED AT OWNERS EXPENSE. MANUFACTURER FILED A COMPLAINT FOR THE CONTACT, AND TOLD HER TO CALL…
Read full complaint
DT: THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE BACK DRIVER'S SIDE WINDOW WAS FAULTY. SHE TRIED TO ROLL THE WINDOW UP WHEN SHE HEARD A CLICKING NOISE AND THE WINDOW WOULD NOT GO UP OR DOWN. DEALER SAID THE REGULATOR NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. PART WAS REPLACED AT OWNERS EXPENSE. MANUFACTURER FILED A COMPLAINT FOR THE CONTACT, AND TOLD HER TO CALL NHTSA. *AK
DT: ALL FOUR POWER WINDOWS WILL NOT WORK. FROM MARCH THROUGH SEPTEMBER OF 2005 I THEY EACH QUIT WORKING. THE PROBLEMS DID NOT OCCUR ALL AT THE SAME TIME. THE CONSUMER STATED THAT THE REAR WINDOWS WERE RARELY USED; PROBABLY NOT MORE THAN SIX TIMES. WHEN THE WINDOWS WERE INSPECTED THE MECHANIC TOLD THE CONSUMER THAT THE PROBL…
Read full complaint
DT: ALL FOUR POWER WINDOWS WILL NOT WORK. FROM MARCH THROUGH SEPTEMBER OF 2005 I THEY EACH QUIT WORKING. THE PROBLEMS DID NOT OCCUR ALL AT THE SAME TIME. THE CONSUMER STATED THAT THE REAR WINDOWS WERE RARELY USED; PROBABLY NOT MORE THAN SIX TIMES. WHEN THE WINDOWS WERE INSPECTED THE MECHANIC TOLD THE CONSUMER THAT THE PROBLEM WAS WITH THE REGULATORS IN THE WINDOW MOTORS. AFTER TAKING THE DOORS APART HE FOUND THAT THE CABLES IN EACH OF THE REGULATORS SNAPPED. ALSO, TOLD THE CONSUMER THAT HE HAD NEVER SEEN A POWER WINDOW SYSTEM SET UP LIKE THESE WERE. THEY WERE UNABLE TO REPLACE JUST THE CABLES, BUT, HAD TO REPLACE THE ENTIRE REGULATOR IN EACH WINDOW. THE PARTS FOR THE REAR WINDOWS WERE ONLY AVAILABLE THROUGH GM DIRECTLY. THE CONSUMER FELT THAT THE CABLES IN THE REGULATORS WERE DEFECTIVE. *AK
Official recalls
504V090000 · Fuel System, Gasoline:delivery
Feb 24, 2004
ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH 3800 V6 (L36) ENGINES AND CERTAIN DELPHI FUEL PRESSURE REGULATORS, THE REGULATORS HAVE A MUCH HIGHER THAN USUAL RATE OF FUEL LEAKS. A LEAK CAN ALLOW FUEL TO ENTER THE INTAKE MANIFOLD THROUGH A VACUUM LINE. IF THE ENGINE DOES NOT START WHEN CRANKED, THE FUEL FROM THE LEAKING REGULATOR AND A MISTIMED SPARK CAN CAUSE A BACKFIRE.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: THE BACKFIRE CAN RUPTURE THE INTAKE MANIFOLD. THE RUPTURE OF THE INTAKE MANIFOLD CAN DISPLACE A FUEL LINE, PULLING AN INJECTOR OUT OF PLACE, AND CAUSING A FUEL LEAK AND POSSIBLE FIRE.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSTALL NEW FUEL PRESSURE REGULATORS WITH IMPROVED DIAPHRAGMS. THE RECALL WILL BE CONDUCTED IN PHASED MAILINGS. PHASE 1 BEGAN ON JUNE 30, 2004, AND PHASE 2 BEGAN ON SEPTEMBER 30, 2004. OWNERS SHOULD CONTACT BUICK AT 1-866-608-8080, OLDSMOBILE AT 1-800-630-6537, OR PONTIAC AT 1-800-620-7668.
00V114000 · Service Brakes, Hydraulic:foundation Components
Apr 17, 2000
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES. SOME OF THESE VEHICLES HAVE INTERNAL FLUID LEAKS IN THE BRAKE HYDRAULIC CONTROL UNIT.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: WHEN THE REAR BRAKE PROPORTIONING, ANTILOCK BRAKE, TRACTION CONTROL, OR STABILITY CONTROL FEATURE IS ACTIVATED IN SOME DRIVING SITUATIONS, THE FEATURE MAY NOT PERFORM AS DESIGNED.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE ABS HYDRAULIC MODULATOR UNIT AND IF NECESSARY, REPLACE THE HYDRAULIC MODULATOR.
99V355000 · Exterior Lighting:headlights
Dec 17, 1999
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES. THESE VEHICLES DO NOT CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF FMVSS NO. 108, "LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT." THE HEAD LAMP ADJUSTMENT DEVICE HORIZONTAL ADJUSTER MAY NOT MOVE THE HEAD LAMP REFLECTOR WHEN THE SHAFT IS ROTATED IN A NORMAL MANNER DURING AIMING.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: DRIVER VISIBILITY MAY BE IMPAIRED INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH.
Remedy: AN INSERT CONTAINING INSTRUCTIONS FOR OPTICALLY AIMING THE HEADLAMPS WILL BE PROVIDED TO OWNERS FOR THE OWNER'S MANUAL. OWNERS SHOULD FOLLOW THE PROCEDURE IN THE INSERT FOR HEADLAMP AIM ADJUSTMENT, RATHER THAN USING THE HORIZONTAL VHAD INDICATOR.
99V301000 · Steering:linkages:tie Rod Assembly
Oct 29, 1999
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES. THE INNER TIE ROD NUTS ARE LOOSE AND CAN RESULT IN SEPARATION OF A TIE ROD.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: SEPARATION OF A TIE ROD CAN CAUSE UNEXPECTED STEERING INPUT INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL CHECK AND ADJUST THE VEHICLE TOE-IN AND TIGHTEN THE INNER TIE ROD NUTS TO THE SPECIFIED TORQUE.
99V238000 · Service Brakes, Hydraulic:power Assist:vacuum
Aug 27, 1999
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES. THE BRAKE BOOSTER TO PEDAL ASSEMBLY ATTACHMENT NUTS MAY BE LOOSE.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: IF THESE NUTS ARE LOOSE, THE BRAKE PEDAL MAY BE LOW, THE ASSEMBLY MAY BE LOOSE, THE BRAKES MAY NOT RELEASE, AND IF THE NUTS BACK COMPLETELY OFF, BRAKING MAY BE LOST. ALSO FUME AND WATER INTRUSION TO THE PASSENGER COMPARTMENT CAN OCCUR.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE ANY MISSING BRAKE BOOSTER TO BRAKE PEDAL ASSEMBLY NUTS AND TIGHTEN ALL FOUR (4) NUTS TO SPECIFIED TORQUE.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
2EA02030 · Engine Compartment Fires
Opened Oct 22, 2002 · Closed Mar 9, 2004
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Fuel System, Gasoline; Fuel System, Gasoline:delivery; Fuel System, Gasoline:delivery:hoses, Lines/piping, And Fittings
EA02-030 IS CLOSED WITH GMEA02-030 IS CLOSED WITH GM?S ACTIONS IN 03V-473 AND 04V-090 RECALLING APPROXIMATELY 529,000 MY 1998-99 C- AND H-BODY VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH DEFECTIVE FUEL PRESSURE REGULATORS.THESE VEHICLES WERE EQUIPPED WITH PLASTIC INTAKE MANIFOLDS THAT ARE UNABLE TO CONTAIN PRESSURES THAT OCCUR IN SOME BACKFIRE EVENTS AND DEFECTIVE FUEL PRESSURE REGULATORS WITH LEAKING DIAPHRAGMS THAT CAN PROVIDE A SOURCE OF FUEL TO PRODUCE A COMBUSTIBLE AIR-FUEL MIXTURE IN THE MANIFOLD.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY ODI THAT NO SAFETY DEFECT EXISTS IN THE VEHICLES THAT ARE NOT INCLUDED IN GM?S RECALLS.ODI WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR THE INCIDENCE OF MANIFOLD RUPTURES AND RELATED FIRES IN OTHER MY 1995-2002 GM PASSENGER CARS EQUIPPED WITH THE SUBJECT INTAKE MANIFOLD.FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, SEE THE ATTACHED CLOSING REPORT.
Additional source detail variants (3)
Fuel System, Gasoline:delivery
EA02-030 IS CLOSED WITH GMEA02-030 IS CLOSED WITH GM?S ACTIONS IN 03V-473 AND 04V-090 RECALLING APPROXIMATELY 529,000 MY 1998-99 C- AND H-BODY VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH DEFECTIVE FUEL PRESSURE REGULATORS.THESE VEHICLES WERE EQUIPPED WITH PLASTIC INTAKE MANIFOLDS THAT ARE UNABLE TO CONTAIN PRESSURES THAT OCCUR IN SOME BACKFIRE EVENTS AND DEFECTIVE FUEL PRESSURE REGULATORS WITH LEAKING DIAPHRAGMS THAT CAN PROVIDE A SOURCE OF FUEL TO PRODUCE A COMBUSTIBLE AIR-FUEL MIXTURE IN THE MANIFOLD.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY ODI THAT NO SAFETY DEFECT EXISTS IN THE VEHICLES THAT ARE NOT INCLUDED IN GM?S RECALLS.ODI WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR THE INCIDENCE OF MANIFOLD RUPTURES AND RELATED FIRES IN OTHER MY 1995-2002 GM PASSENGER CARS EQUIPPED WITH THE SUBJECT INTAKE MANIFOLD.FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, SEE THE ATTACHED CLOSING REPORT.
Fuel System, Gasoline:delivery:hoses, Lines/piping, And Fittings
EA02-030 IS CLOSED WITH GMEA02-030 IS CLOSED WITH GM?S ACTIONS IN 03V-473 AND 04V-090 RECALLING APPROXIMATELY 529,000 MY 1998-99 C- AND H-BODY VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH DEFECTIVE FUEL PRESSURE REGULATORS.THESE VEHICLES WERE EQUIPPED WITH PLASTIC INTAKE MANIFOLDS THAT ARE UNABLE TO CONTAIN PRESSURES THAT OCCUR IN SOME BACKFIRE EVENTS AND DEFECTIVE FUEL PRESSURE REGULATORS WITH LEAKING DIAPHRAGMS THAT CAN PROVIDE A SOURCE OF FUEL TO PRODUCE A COMBUSTIBLE AIR-FUEL MIXTURE IN THE MANIFOLD.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY ODI THAT NO SAFETY DEFECT EXISTS IN THE VEHICLES THAT ARE NOT INCLUDED IN GM?S RECALLS.ODI WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR THE INCIDENCE OF MANIFOLD RUPTURES AND RELATED FIRES IN OTHER MY 1995-2002 GM PASSENGER CARS EQUIPPED WITH THE SUBJECT INTAKE MANIFOLD.FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, SEE THE ATTACHED CLOSING REPORT.
Fuel System, Gasoline
EA02-030 IS CLOSED WITH GMEA02-030 IS CLOSED WITH GM?S ACTIONS IN 03V-473 AND 04V-090 RECALLING APPROXIMATELY 529,000 MY 1998-99 C- AND H-BODY VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH DEFECTIVE FUEL PRESSURE REGULATORS.THESE VEHICLES WERE EQUIPPED WITH PLASTIC INTAKE MANIFOLDS THAT ARE UNABLE TO CONTAIN PRESSURES THAT OCCUR IN SOME BACKFIRE EVENTS AND DEFECTIVE FUEL PRESSURE REGULATORS WITH LEAKING DIAPHRAGMS THAT CAN PROVIDE A SOURCE OF FUEL TO PRODUCE A COMBUSTIBLE AIR-FUEL MIXTURE IN THE MANIFOLD.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY ODI THAT NO SAFETY DEFECT EXISTS IN THE VEHICLES THAT ARE NOT INCLUDED IN GM?S RECALLS.ODI WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR THE INCIDENCE OF MANIFOLD RUPTURES AND RELATED FIRES IN OTHER MY 1995-2002 GM PASSENGER CARS EQUIPPED WITH THE SUBJECT INTAKE MANIFOLD.FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, SEE THE ATTACHED CLOSING REPORT.
PE02050 · Engine Compartment Fires
Opened Jun 13, 2002 · Closed Oct 22, 2002
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Engine And Engine Cooling
No summary supplied.
Illustration